In the late 1870s, heav, restrictive underclothes, which had created such a storm in the pages of women’s magaines, were graduall discarded.Shoe Carnival continued to add new stores to its chain during 1994. By the end of the year, there were 87 Shoe Carnival stores operating in 15 states. Besides increasing the store number, the company upgraded its Evansville distribution center to 108,000 square feet and installed a mechanized merchandise handling system. The new system allowed Shoe Carnival to reduce its store inventories and to deliver shoe styles that were hot sellers more quickly.Jordan Shoes. That system was augmented by a new computerized point-of-sale system that connected all of the store’s cash registers into the company’s headquarters computer system. Clothes got lighter, shorter and simpler. Yet until 1914, clothes were ankle length, as the had been since the thirteenth centur. B 1915, however, the hemline of the skirt rose dramaticall to mid-calf. Changes in women’s clothing came about as a result of the two World wars.

Current criminal procedure system we need to be further improved, we are conducting some of the reforms is to make up for deficiencies in the system to play a better role in criminal litigation system. Between relatives the right to refuse to permit the establishment of the system will be the protection of human rights in criminal proceedings to play

Items. Fair value in criminal proceedings is at the center. [13] one-sided pursuit of efficiency will lead to equity, justice, freedom of the more important the loss of value. Jianli between relatives the right to refuse to permit the system may affect the effectiveness of the proceedings was that, though, refused to permit the right system to protect human rights,
Balanced values, to protect national interests with regard to the role of the efficiency of this value is far greater than the pursuit of Moreover, the criminal evidence system with the continuous improvement and the implementation of the burden of proof, but because of psychological dependence and further out of the efficiency of the proceedings. In short, the establishment of
Relatives between the Privilege is the purpose and value of modern criminal procedure necessary requirement.    To create a rule of law, so that legal regulation of social relations, a comprehensive law is the primary prerequisite. Complete conformity with the law of the value of law should pursue the national interest, and in reality could well be observed, is executed. The

System, the burden of proof to strengthen the relevant institutions, to strengthen the evidence concerned efforts, to further improve the system of criminal evidence in a bid to help fight crime, procedures are more fair, more reasonable more convincing, would better protect national interests.    Procedure theory holds that the purpose of criminal proceedings has a dual nature, that is, punishing
Crime and protecting human rights. Punishing crime and protecting human rights, a dual purpose, the legislature and the judiciary in the protection of human rights in line with the premise of crime punishable by law. Criminal system on the worldwide development of the overall trend, the process further in punishing crime, respect the individual’s legitimate rights and interests, expanding and
Effective protection of criminal suspects, defendants, legal rights of other persons, but acknowledged the Chinese and foreign scholars international trends. Seek to minimize the cost of receiving the maximum effect of punishing crime, is development of national criminal systems in the sought-after.    The value of the pursuit of criminal proceedings are multiple, including the justice, order, efficiency and other various

In modern society than the traditional culture of the functions under the family, nature, form, structure and associated with its morals, have occurred with the development of society has changed significantly. However, traditional values about family relationships due to the inertia of history, will also maintain its stability for a long time. If the law to force people to violate
Nature of inter-incrimination so that relatives will inevitably greatly hurt the feelings between family relatives, destruction of the family’s traditional values, also bound to affect the family’s harmony. When the basic unit of society is destroyed, when the values we have been broken, how can we talk about order and stability, social harmony? Therefore, the establishment between family members the
Right to refuse to license is consistent with the long-term national interest, to national, social and better development.    Interaction between family members in the deliberate pursuit of incriminating circumstances, is bound to neglect other aspects of evidence collection efforts, weakening the relevant agencies of the burden of proof. Therefore, should be established between relatives the right to refuse to permit

Human rights on witnesses. Therefore, the concern and attention to the rights of witnesses, to strengthen human rights protection of witnesses in criminal proceedings, given evidence of their right of refusal among relatives, is to improve the system of criminal procedure and human rights protection of witnesses necessary requirement.    Established between relatives the right to refuse to permit system, criminal
Evidence and perfect the system and the implementation of the investigation organs of the burden of proof in order to safeguard national interests and family interests. Whether to give family interests, which is actually a benefit dilemma. Between relatives Privilege certain point of view is the family, the family interests to make concessions, but in the long run is to
Protect the national interest. The family is the basic unit of society is the basic unit of the State. Long-term stability must depend on family harmony, order and stability, social harmony. In the order and stability, social harmony and many other interests, family ties in some of the privileges of evidence law to maintain a realistic demand.    Although the family

System is in line with traditional moral values and national conditions, is a realistic and long-term significance.    Human rights as basic human rights, more and more countries and international organizations of importance and concern. Strengthen the protection of human rights around the world have become the consensus of the world today. Criminal proceedings, as in terms of human rights protection
May be weaker and more vulnerable to abuse public power part. The protection of human rights in criminal proceedings as an important part of human rights protection has attracted wide attention. The protection of human rights in criminal proceedings is extremely broad, from the main sense, not only criminal suspects, defendants, victims, the private prosecutor of human rights protection, along
With witnesses and other relevant personnel to protect human rights, they also face possible rights infringed, denied or limited to the case.    Human rights more and more attention, many scholars proposed to establish a right to silence, the right against self-incrimination and other privileges. Meanwhile, China has joined a number of international conventions is also clear that the protection of

Have played an important role. People usually do not when faced with family relationships and other interests. Family love this non-rational factors, is bound by law and should be addressed, tolerance or compromise.    Father and son love, blood love, but instinct. If the father regardless of family ties and evidence of forced child crimes, crimes parent child card, what is
The extent the credibility of their testimony? Some scholars, "the witness whether the relationship with the client’s relatives and friends affected the reliability of their testimony" for a survey, that "in some cases will affect the" accounted for 67%; that "will definitely affect the" 31%; that " will not affect the "only 2%.  to face reality, we should rethink established
Between relative significance of Privilege? Perhaps the line between the full establishment of family system will affect the right to refuse to permit the testimony of the acquisition, adaptation may be more or less during a certain extent affect the efficiency of litigation. However, according to the actual, and gradually build Privilege is an important measure to improve the legal

Areas, the law is not the only means of control, or is not the best means. If we must control the law, it could lead to excessive social costs, more losses than gains, causing the tyranny of the law. Family, kinship has always been human nature. Between relatives can testify that the problem is a legal right to intervene should
Not be more, even the lack of involvement in the field. In addition to the law, perhaps there are other more effective means, such as moral, ethical. As the "Bible" what is said, to God return to God, Caesar Caesar’s return.    Moral tradition in human long, even the modern building of spiritual civilization, there is still the stigma of traditional
Ethics and moral values. Family, ethics is still cherished by most people today. National law can not but to the human family as the foundation for the human family is the most basic and most can not escape contact, family love is the most instinctive love of people. Family feelings for humanity, order, and the construction aspects of social infrastructure,

System was not adopted. Criminal Procedure Law Article 48 provides: "Any person who knows the case, have the duty to testify. Physically, mentally defective or young, can not distinguish right from wrong, can not properly express themselves, can not witness." This was subject to a specific person can not waive the obligation to testify, any information on the case who
Has the duty to testify. Laws are designed course is good, and if each witness can testify the efficiency of natural help to litigation, the fight against crime. However, in practice such provisions are often caught in a dilemma: to witness, I should appear in court to prove the guilt of my family; the judge, the relative probative force of
The testimony of witnesses is the same as other witnesses; matter of law, whether all those who refuse to testify must do the same sanctions?    Law is a social product of a system to regulate people’s behavior, but the law is never a panacea. Law as a system of social norms, there is always inherent defects or limitations. For some